PRINCIPAL AREA

Real Estate and Land Law

The outcome of a property dispute is usually decided before the statement of claim is written. A case filed without first reading the title register, the underlying deeds, the zoning status and the cadastral sheet comes back years later on a procedural point. This is the firm's centre of gravity.

IN SHORT

In a Turkish property dispute the first step is not filing a case but obtaining the title register and the underlying documents (the deed of conveyance, the certificate of inheritance, the zoning certificate, the cadastral record) and deciding which action will actually produce a result. In actions concerning rights in rem over immovable property the competent court is the court where the property is located, and that jurisdiction is mandatory: a case filed in the wrong place is dismissed without the merits being examined.

What this area covers

Property disputes are among the most document-heavy areas of Turkish law. Four different routes may be open on the same set of facts, and three of them can come back years later on limitation or standing. That is why every file starts in the same place: examination of the register and the deeds.

The minimum set of documents examined:

  • The title register extract and the deed of conveyance (stated price, transaction date, declarations of the parties)
  • The cadastral record for the property and its sheet / block / parcel references
  • The zoning status certificate from the municipality, plus any amendments to the zoning plan
  • In inheritance matters, the certificate of inheritance and the deceased's history of title transactions
  • In construction-for-land-share files, the contract, the power of attorney and the building permit

Once that examination is finished, in most files the type of action determines itself.

Common file types

Dispute Typical action Competent court
Wrongful registration, forgery, lack of capacity Annulment of title deed Civil court of first instance
Transfer by the deceased to defeat an heir Collusive transfer (muris muvazaasi) Civil court of first instance
Co-owners unable to divide the property Dissolution of co-ownership Civil court of peace
A share sold to an outsider Pre-emption (onalim / sufa) Civil court of first instance
Administration taking the land, price unpaid Expropriation Civil court / administrative court
Plan amendment, permit, building restriction Zoning law Administrative court
Developer failing to deliver the flat Construction for land share Civil / commercial court
Unauthorised use, occupation Occupation compensation (ecrimisil) Civil court of first instance

What makes land files different

Disputes over undeveloped land differ from disputes over built property in three respects.

Shared title. Land is usually bought through co-ownership. The more co-owners there are, the more both sale and use lock up; and when one co-owner sells a share to an outsider, a right of pre-emption arises for the others. Before buying into a shared title you must establish whether the co-owners have a written or de facto agreement dividing use of the land. Where such a de facto division exists, the pre-emption right may not be exercisable.

Zoning status against physical reality. Land described as "zoned" in a sales conversation is frequently something else on the plan: agricultural designation, a strip surrendered for road widening, a public-share deduction, an area reserved for public use. A deposit paid before reading the zoning certificate and the plan notes can turn into a loss that cannot be recovered.

Cadastral and physical boundary conflicts. A boundary on the sheet that does not match the boundary on the ground, a structure encroaching on the neighbouring parcel, rights of way: these appear in most land files and make a site inspection and expert examination unavoidable.

Time limits: the right most often lost

Some property actions are not subject to any limitation period. Others run against a forfeiture period, and once it passes the substance of the right cannot even be argued.

  • Pre-emption: three months from notification of the sale through a notary, and in any event two years from the sale (Turkish Civil Code art. 733).
  • Action against an expropriation decision: thirty days from service (Expropriation Act no. 2942, art. 14).
  • Objection to a zoning plan: within the one-month display period; and sixty days before the administrative court once the objection is rejected.
  • Collusive transfer and annulment based on wrongful registration: as a rule not time-barred, but the acquisition of third parties who relied on the register in good faith becomes protected over time. Waiting always works against you.

How the file proceeds

  1. Initial consultation. We listen to the facts and look at the documents you hold; we identify what is missing.
  2. Register examination. Title, cadastral and zoning records are obtained; the real legal character of the file is established.
  3. Route map. Litigation, mediation or settlement options, with the likely duration, cost and risks set out in writing.
  4. Conduct of the file. Pleadings, evidence, site inspection and expert stage, with the client informed at each step.
  5. Outcome and follow-up. Judgment, assessment of appeal, and enforcement.

The stage-by-stage account is on the How we work page.

This page is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Prepared in line with the Union of Turkish Bar Associations’ advertising restrictions. This English text is a courtesy translation; in case of any discrepancy the Turkish text prevails.